ArticleCommunications in statistics: Simulation and computation2025
Statistical methods for assessing treatment effects on ordinal outcomes using observational data.
Article in Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this article, we propose a marginal structural ordinal logistic regression model (MS-OLRM) to assess treatment effects on ordinal outcomes. Many statistical methods have been developed to estimate average treatment effect (ATE) when the outcome is continuous or binary. The methodology for assessing the effect of treatment for an ordinal outcome is less studied. To address this, we propose utilizing a superiority score as a measure of treatment effect, assessing whether the outcome under treatment is stochastically larger than the outcome under control. Our approach involves employing MS-OLRM in conjunction with Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) to estimate the superiority score under treatment compared to the control. This methodology adjusts for confounding factors between treatment and outcome by utilizing IPTW, ensuring that all covariates are balanced among different treatment groups in the weighted sample. To assess the performance of the proposed method, we conduct extensive simulation studies. Finally, we apply the developed method to assess the treatment effects of medications and behavioral therapies on patients' recovery from alcohol use disorders using the Kentucky Medicaid 2012-2019 database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.