ArticleEvidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health2024
Surveying Child and Adolescent Inpatient Psychiatric Units: Demographics, Policies, and Practice.
Article in Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing a Psychology Consultation Model on an Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital Unit.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The increasing demand for acute inpatient psychiatric unit (IPU) treatment for children and adolescents in recent years has put significant pressure on hospital systems to provide efficient and effective care. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the characteristics of IPU care for children and adolescents in the US, making it difficult for institutions to benchmark their performance against nationwide standards or understand generalizability of existing research. Objective: To address this gap in the literature by beginning to collect descriptive data on significant variables for youth care from a geographically and institutionally diverse group of on Child and Adolescent IPUs. Method: A multi-institutional research team conducted a nationwide (US) survey of child and adolescent IPU clinicians using snowball sampling. Recruitment emails were sent to IPU groups in the American Psychological Association and the American Academy Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Results: The study yielded data from 12 institutions with a total of 20 IPUs, representing over 23,000 admissions in the years 2019 and 2020. The results of the survey show wide variability in institutional definitions of key variables (such as readmissions and safety events) as well as large ranges in length of stay, restraints, seclusions, and safety events. Conclusion: This study reveals the importance of IPU clinical researchers taking steps to build a robust evidence base for IPU care, including developing consensus definitions of key variables and conceptualizing why high degrees of variability exist in important variables of IPU care. The survey results provide valuable insights for hospital systems, policymakers, and clinicians in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.