ArticlePloS one2025
A standardized scoring method for measuring white cast of mineral sunscreens and improving user compliance across diverse skin tones.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seeing Skin Tone Differently: An Experimental Comparison of Objective Measurements and Subjective Perceptions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUsing broad-spectrum sunscreen is an effective practice for preventing skin cancers caused by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Mineral sunscreens containing zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) as physical UV filters are suitable for individuals with sensitive skin or allergies to chemical UV filters. Consumer compliance with sunscreen application depends largely on its cosmetic elegance, especially regarding white cast. Despite this, there is no official method to quantify white cast and help design sunscreens for diverse skin tones.
methodsTo address this gap, we developed white cast scoring protocols that combine 1) inter-rater reliability (ICC) of expert graders and thirteen study volunteers ranking the white cast produced by ZnO test formulations with 2) objective CIEL*a*b* measurements determined after sunscreen application both in vivo and in vitro.
resultsOur findings demonstrate a significant correlation between increasing ZnO percentages and higher L* values (whiteness) resulting in a more visible white cast, as assessed by Pearson coefficient in vivo (r ≥ 0.822; p < 0.001) and Kruskal-Wallis (p < 0.0001) with Dunn's post hoc pairwise comparisons. White cast scores for the ZnO formulations were substantially consistent across both in vivo and in vitro methodologies, with higher ZnO concentrations producing unacceptable levels of white cast.
conclusionThis study provides a white cast scoring system, based on subjective white cast perception and L* values, as a quantitative tool for evaluating and refining mineral sunscreen formulations, contributing to developing more cosmetically elegant sunscreens suitable for a wide range of skin tones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.