ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of virtual reality and real environment effects on perception of height in healthy individuals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of mechanically stimulated sacculus on our height perception.
methodsBetween 1.09.2022 and 30.06.2023, 52 volunteers, 27 women and 25 men, aged 20-50 years, were included in the study. Pure tone audiometry test, acoustic immittance, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) and mini mental tests (MMSE) were performed on these individuals. Afterwards, height estimations were made by looking from top to bottom and from bottom to top using mechanical stimulation in real environment and elevator simulation in virtual reality (VR) environment. Participants were informed in writing with an informed consent form and their signed consent was obtained.
resultsThe averages of the height estimates made in the VR environment and in the real environment were compared with each other and no significant difference was observed (p > 0.05). When the height estimations made in the VR environment and in the real environment were compared with the current height value, a significant difference was observed only in the height estimation made by looking from the bottom up in the VR environment, and it was found to be higher than the current height (p < 0.05). When the height estimation values in the VR environment and in the real environment were compared with the place where height estimation was started, no significant difference was observed (p > 0.05).
conclusionIn our study, the effect of the mechanical effect of the saccule on the height perception was investigated, and no significant difference was obtained in the height estimates made in the VR environment and in the real environment. Mechanical stimulation of the saccule is thought to have a limited role in height perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.