ArticlePloS one2025
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol on Depressive Symptoms Among Medical Students in South Asia Using Patient-reported Validated Assessment Tools: Prevalence and Associated Factors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression among medical students in South Asia is notably higher than the global average, with prevalence rates ranging from approximately 30% to 60%. Untreated depression not only affects individual student's well-being, but also impacts academic performance and future clinical competence. This study protocol aims to synthesize evidence on the prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms among medical students in South Asia. The study will systematically navigate Medline (PubMed), Scopus, CINHAL, EMBASE, and APA PsycInfo for studies available before 1st May, 2025, following PRISMA guidelines for reporting and adhering to PRISMA-P standards for protocol development. The search will search for grey literature and adopt citation chain technique, using keyword truncation and string search along with standard indexing terms. Observational longitudinal studies, including cross-sectional, cohort studies, and case-control using validated patient-reported depressive symptoms measuring tools comprising South Asian medical students. Review articles, intervention studies, case reports, case series, commentaries, pre-prints, conference abstracts, protocols, unpublished research, and correspondences will not be considered. No language limitation will be applied. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. The study aims to extract information on prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms, conducting a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis using random effect models. Forest and funnel plots will be used to visualize findings, while heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic, with subgroup and sensitivity analysis performed to ascertain the robustness. Risk of bias (RoB) will be measured adopting the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (mNOS). Statistical analysis will be conducted using R studio v.4.3.2 and GraphPad Prism v.9.0. Understanding the prevalence and risk factors is essential to guide targeted interventions and evidence-based policy reforms that support the mental well-being of future healthcare professionals. By systematically synthesizing data from observational studies, this review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of depressive symptoms, prevalence and its correlates among medical students in South Asian region, laying the groundwork for preventive strategies and improved mental health care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.