Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857283›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

From static to dynamic: Embracing dynamics in isotopic diet estimation.

Emilie Cathelin, Sebastien Lefebvre, Carolina Giraldo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emilie CathelinStation marine de Wimereux, UMR 8187 - LOG - Laboratoire d'Océanologie et de Géosciences, Université de Lille, CNRS, Université Littoral Côte d'Opale, IRD, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5061-3321
Sebastien LefebvreStation marine de Wimereux, UMR 8187 - LOG - Laboratoire d'Océanologie et de Géosciences, Université de Lille, CNRS, Université Littoral Côte d'Opale, IRD, Lille, France.
Carolina GiraldoHMMN - Unité halieutique Manche-Mer du Nord, IFREMER, Boulogne sur mer, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0278-522X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isotopic mixing models are widely used in ecology to quantify the diets of organisms. Most of these models assume that stable isotopic systems remain stable over time (a premise known as the steady-state hypothesis) and are therefore referred to as static mixing models. However, evidence shows that temporal dynamics-such as variations in isotopic turnover rates, diet shifts, and fluctuations in the isotopic signatures of both sources and consumers-can introduce significant bias into model outputs. Despite the recognition of such dynamics, the factors influencing bias and its implications remain underexplored. This study uses modelling and in silico experiments to characterize bias in mixing models resulting from temporal dynamics and to develop a dynamic mixing model that accounts for these effects. The results revealed that bias is strongly influenced by the interaction between the isotopic turnover rate and sampling frequency, emphasizing the importance of time variability in isotopic turnover. Additional sources of bias include the consumer's isotopic signature prior to a dietary shift, which reflects the distance from equilibrium with the new diet. This bias can be further amplified by temporal fluctuations in source signatures. Our study also evaluates previously recommended strategies to mitigate bias, confirming their effectiveness in reducing errors in static models and providing additional guidelines for their application. Furthermore, it improves access to a dynamic mixing model, enabling direct comparison with static approaches and demonstrating its robustness and accuracy in estimating diets under dynamic conditions.

Indexed as

DietModels, BiologicalAnimalsCarbon IsotopesComputer SimulationCarbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID40857283
PMCPMC12380277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.