ArticlePloS one2025
From static to dynamic: Embracing dynamics in isotopic diet estimation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isotopic mixing models are widely used in ecology to quantify the diets of organisms. Most of these models assume that stable isotopic systems remain stable over time (a premise known as the steady-state hypothesis) and are therefore referred to as static mixing models. However, evidence shows that temporal dynamics-such as variations in isotopic turnover rates, diet shifts, and fluctuations in the isotopic signatures of both sources and consumers-can introduce significant bias into model outputs. Despite the recognition of such dynamics, the factors influencing bias and its implications remain underexplored. This study uses modelling and in silico experiments to characterize bias in mixing models resulting from temporal dynamics and to develop a dynamic mixing model that accounts for these effects. The results revealed that bias is strongly influenced by the interaction between the isotopic turnover rate and sampling frequency, emphasizing the importance of time variability in isotopic turnover. Additional sources of bias include the consumer's isotopic signature prior to a dietary shift, which reflects the distance from equilibrium with the new diet. This bias can be further amplified by temporal fluctuations in source signatures. Our study also evaluates previously recommended strategies to mitigate bias, confirming their effectiveness in reducing errors in static models and providing additional guidelines for their application. Furthermore, it improves access to a dynamic mixing model, enabling direct comparison with static approaches and demonstrating its robustness and accuracy in estimating diets under dynamic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.