ArticlePloS one2025
Managing minor ailments and pharmacy services: How do people make their decisions?
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare systems face challenges such as rising costs and workforce shortages. Optimal resource allocation is needed, notably in the management of minor ailments. Community pharmacy services (e.g., minor ailment schemes) remain underused by the population. This study explores the decision-making process when people are managing minor ailments: What influences their choices among the management options? What is their level of information and willingness to use and pay for pharmacy services?
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire (convenience sampling) from 07.11.2023 to 08.12.2023 in Switzerland. The survey explored general decision-making process in minor ailment management through three clinical scenarios, factors influencing the choice of pharmacy services, as well as public knowledge of three available pharmacy services and their willingness to use and pay for them.
resultsA total of 508 valid responses were analysed (99.8%). Perceived severity of symptoms (98%, n = 495) and time to deal with symptoms (78%, n = 396) were the most important criteria in making the management decision. The more serious the symptoms were perceived, the less the pharmacy and self-medication were privileged. Choosing pharmacy depended mainly on the perceived staff's skills (83%, n = 420) and direct access to medicines (81%, n = 409). Public awareness of pharmacy services was low. Respondents were more willing to use autonomous prescribing than other services, with low willingness to pay out of their pocket.
conclusionsThere is a critical gap between the potential demand for minor ailment services in pharmacy and the public's awareness and valuation of them. Actual uptakes could be improved by better communication and uniformization of pharmacy services, as well as the identification of right incentives to achieve the political goal of adequate orientation in the healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.