Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Generating random graphs with prescribed graphlet frequency bounds derived from probabilistic networks.

Bram Mornie, Didier Colle, Pieter Audenaert, Mario Pickavet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bram MornieIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University - imec, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2087-6993
Didier ColleIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University - imec, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter AudenaertIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University - imec, Ghent, Belgium.
Mario PickavetIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University - imec, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing or benchmarking network algorithms in bioinformatics requires a diverse set of networks with realistic properties. Real networks are often supplemented by randomly generated synthetic ones, but most graph generative models do not take into account the distribution of subgraph patterns, i.e. motifs or graphlets. Moreover, in many cases, biological interactions are uncertain events and must be modeled by probabilistic graph edges. The uncertainty is often ignored in practice, which can lead to incorrect conclusions about the properties of biological networks. In this work, we instead derive bounds on the graphlet counts and degree distribution of a probabilistic target network and use this information as input to a novel random graph generation algorithm. The algorithm grows graphs incrementally by making small modifications in every step, which allows for an efficient graphlet counting method. Using this method, we can update graphlet counts after each iteration in a time independent of the total node number on sparse graphs. We evaluate our model on synthetic and real networks of different sizes and with different degrees of uncertainty. Although computation times strongly depend on the size of graphlets taken into account, our experiments demonstrate that graphs with over 10 000 edges and well-controlled frequencies of all three- and four-node graphlets can be generated in under an hour.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationProbability

Identifiers

PMID40857227
PMCPMC12380345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.