ArticlePloS one2025
Generating random graphs with prescribed graphlet frequency bounds derived from probabilistic networks.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testing or benchmarking network algorithms in bioinformatics requires a diverse set of networks with realistic properties. Real networks are often supplemented by randomly generated synthetic ones, but most graph generative models do not take into account the distribution of subgraph patterns, i.e. motifs or graphlets. Moreover, in many cases, biological interactions are uncertain events and must be modeled by probabilistic graph edges. The uncertainty is often ignored in practice, which can lead to incorrect conclusions about the properties of biological networks. In this work, we instead derive bounds on the graphlet counts and degree distribution of a probabilistic target network and use this information as input to a novel random graph generation algorithm. The algorithm grows graphs incrementally by making small modifications in every step, which allows for an efficient graphlet counting method. Using this method, we can update graphlet counts after each iteration in a time independent of the total node number on sparse graphs. We evaluate our model on synthetic and real networks of different sizes and with different degrees of uncertainty. Although computation times strongly depend on the size of graphlets taken into account, our experiments demonstrate that graphs with over 10 000 edges and well-controlled frequencies of all three- and four-node graphlets can be generated in under an hour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.