Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857166›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Assessing AlphaFold 3 for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Docking in Protein Structures.

Xiping Gong, Hualu Zhou, Qingguo Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiping GongDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia 30223, United States.
Hualu ZhouDepartment of Food Science and Technology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia 30223, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5594-0241
Qingguo HuangDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia 30223, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-9404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants that may pose health risks due to strong protein interactions. While AlphaFold 3 (AF3) was recently introduced for protein-ligand modeling with high claimed accuracy, its reliability for docking PFAS remains unclear. This study evaluates AF3's performance in predicting protein-PFAS interactions using a curated data set from the Protein Data Bank, divided into a "Before Set" (seen during AF3 training) and an "After Set" (unseen). AF3 accurately predicts protein structures and pockets but shows reduced performance in pocket-aligned ligand predictions, achieving ∼74.5% success in "Before Set" but only ∼55.8% in "After Set", indicative of possible overfitting. We further assess the effects of PFAS type on docking outcomes. Although AF3 accurately predicts binding pockets, it favors poses where the headgroup of environment-relevant PFAS interacts with polar or positively charged residues. This is different from another native binding mode in several cases, where the hydrophobic tail is inserted in the protein, but the headgroup is exposed to the solvent. Notably, a hybrid approach combining AF3 and Vina, especially considering multiple top-ranked poses, can improve prediction accuracy. These findings support the complementary use of AF3 and Vina for accurately modeling protein-PFAS interactions.

Indexed as

ProteinsEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsLigandsProteinsautoDock vinain-silico binding predictionmolecular dockingPFAS typesprotein-PFAS interactions

Identifiers

PMID40857166
PMCPMC12424161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.