Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857095›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2025

A Social Support Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Feasibility Study With a Microrandomized Trial Design.

Timon Elmer, Markus Wolf, Evelien Snippe, Urte Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timon ElmerApplied Social and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4354-4457
Markus WolfClinical Psychology with Focus on Psychotherapy Research, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-6824
Evelien SnippeDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-7475
Urte ScholzApplied Social and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0184-5921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJust-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) aim to provide psychological support during critical moments in daily life.

objectiveThis preregistered study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a social support JITAI for individuals with subclinical and clinical levels of depressive symptoms awaiting psychotherapy. Triggered by ecological momentary assessment (EMA) reports, the intervention encouraged participants to activate their (digital) social support networks.

methodsA total of 25 participants completed 2689 EMA surveys and received 377 JITAIs over an 18-day intervention period, including a microrandomized trial, to compare 4 strategies to trigger an intervention: fixed cutoff points of distress variables, personalized thresholds (through Shewhart control charts) of distress variables, momentary support need, and no intervention.

resultsThe results showed high feasibility, with participants completing 85.37% (2689/3150) of the EMA surveys, exhibiting a low study-related attrition rate (7%; total attrition rate was 17%), and reporting minimal technical issues. Engagement and perceived helpfulness were heterogeneous and moderate, with participants seeking support in one-third of the instances after an intervention was triggered instances. JITAIs triggered by self-reported need for support were rated as more appropriately timed, helpful, and effective for promoting support-seeking behavior compared to those based on distress indicators, despite being triggered less frequently. Barriers, such as time constraints and perceived unavailability of support providers, likely affected support-seeking behavior, as indicated by additional qualitative analyses. Exploratory effectiveness analyses indicated Cohen d effect sizes between 0.06 and 0.14 in reducing distress after JITAIs were received.

conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrate that a social support JITAI is feasible to implement, with high compliance and minimal technical issues. However, further research is needed to evaluate the JITAI's effectiveness and optimize trigger strategies in addressing individual needs for and barriers to engagement.

Indexed as

DepressionSocial SupportAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddepressiondigital health interventionecological momentary assessmentfeasibilityhelp seekingjust-in-time adaptive interventionmental healthmixed methodssocial support

Identifiers

PMID40857095
PMCPMC12421209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.