Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857002›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Work Status, Absenteeism, Presenteeism, and Quality of Life in Young Adult Cancer Survivors.

Neel S Bhatt, Jenna Voutsinas, Mackenzie Winters, Wendy M Leisenring, Sheri Ballard, Kari Jenssen, K Scott Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neel S BhattClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Jenna VoutsinasClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Mackenzie WintersUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Wendy M LeisenringClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Sheri BallardClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Kari JenssenClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
K Scott BakerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Current literature lacks information on the association between the work status and performance of young adult cancer survivors and their quality of life (QOL). Objective: To assess self-reported work status, missed time at work (absenteeism), and performance (presenteeism) and their associations with QOL among young adult cancer survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study was performed from October 18, 2020, to September 17, 2022, at a single cancer center in Seattle, Washington. Participants included young adult cancer survivors (aged 18 to 39 years at diagnosis) who were 1 year or more from completion of cancer therapy. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2023, to February 1, 2025. Exposures: Cancer therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unemployment rate compared with the age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched general population; standardized absolute and relative absenteeism and presenteeism scores; standardized scores for domains of anxiety, depression, physical function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, social role, and cognition; and adjusted linear regressions to study factors associated with higher QOL scores. Results: A total of 198 survivors, with a median age at diagnosis of 31 (IQR, 26-35) years and a median age at survey of 39 (IQR, 35-44) years were included (142 [71.7%] female). The unemployment rate (14 [7.1%]) did not differ from that of the general population (4.7%) (P = .13). Compared with employed survivors, unemployed survivors reported significantly higher depression scores (coefficient, 5.11; 95% CI, 0.92-9.30) and lower scores for satisfaction with social roles and activities (coefficient, -6.59; 95% CI, -11.34 to -1.84) and physical function (coefficient, -6.63; 95% CI, -11.38 to -1.87). Higher absolute presenteeism score was associated with lower scores for anxiety (coefficient, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.11), depression (coefficient, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.24 to -0.10), fatigue (coefficient, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.10), pain interference (coefficient, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.02), and sleep disturbance (coefficient, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.03) and higher scores for physical function (coefficient, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.008-0.17), cognitive function (coefficient, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.11-0.27), and satisfaction in social roles and activities scores (coefficient, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.24). Additionally, a higher absolute absenteeism score was associated with a higher anxiety (coefficient, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.004-0.07) and lower cognitive function (coefficient, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.004). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of young adult cancer survivors, associations were found between survivors' self-reported work status and performance and their QOL affecting their mental, physical, and social health. These findings call for the development of effective communication strategies with employers to balance work expectations with survivors' treatment-related complications to achieve better performance and in turn higher QOL.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismCancer SurvivorsEmploymentNeoplasmsPresenteeismQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleUnemploymentWashingtonYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40857002
PMCPMC12381670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.