Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Poststroke Cardiorespiratory Exercise for Brain Volume and Cognition: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise and Productive Hippocampal Neurogenesis After Stroke: From Niche Remodeling to Cognitive Recovery.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- ESO annual stroke evidence update 2025.European stroke journal · 2026Review
- Potential Mechanisms of Exercise-Mediated Ferroptosis Regulation in Central Nervous System Diseases.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Stroke increases the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia without proven prevention therapies. Cardiorespiratory exercise (CRX) preserves brain health. Objective: To determine whether a CRX intervention preserves hippocampal volume (HV) and cognition in patients after ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Post-Ischemic Stroke Cardiovascular Exercise Study (PISCES)-Zoom Delivered Intervention Against Cognitive Decline (ZODIAC) is a phase 2b assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial performed at 4 metropolitan health care services in Melbourne, Australia. Eligible participants included adult patients who survived ischemic stroke without comorbidities prohibiting exercise or diagnosed cognitive disorder. Participants were recruited from May 26, 2016, to March 20, 2020, for PISCES in-person training and from November 9, 2020, to February 12, 2024, for ZODIAC remotely delivered home training. A total of 6921 participants were screened for eligibility, 130 were recruited, 107 were randomized (34 in PISCES and 73 in ZODIAC), and 104 continued to intervention. Study visits at 2, 4, and 12 months post stroke included brain magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive testing. Participants were randomized (1:1), stratified by baseline function (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 vs 2-3) and total brain volume. Primary, secondary efficacy, and safety outcome analyses were conducted using modified intention-to-treat (mITT) principle and per protocol. Intervention: Participants received 8 weeks of three 60-minute sessions/wk. Participants in the CRX group received prescribed intensity progressive aerobic and resistance training; the control group received balance and stretching training. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was relative change in HV calculated as the difference between HV at times 1 and 2 divided by HV at time 1. Secondary outcome consisted of 12-month executive function test results (Trial Making Test, Part B [TMT-B]), adjusted for baseline TMT-B and mRS score. Results: The 104 participants included in primary outcome mITT analysis (55 in the control and 49 in the CRX groups; mean [SD] age, 64 [14] years; 67 [64.4%] male; equivalent baseline mRS score). One hundred participants (33 in PISCES and 67 in ZODIAC) completed 4-month assessments, and 97 (31 in PISCES and 66 in ZODIAC) completed 12-month assessments. There were no intervention-related serious adverse events. Mean (SD) difference in relative change in HV between the CRX (-0.26% [2.12%]) and control (-0.11% [2.35%]) groups was -0.10% (95% CI, -1.10% to 0.87%; P = .83). The CRX group (n = 43) performed better than the control group (n = 51) on the adjusted TMT-B at 12 months (adjusted mean difference, -3.75 [95% CI, -5.02 to -2.49] seconds). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of fitness training, CRX was safe but did not preserve HV more than a control condition. CRX may benefit cognitive preservation following ischemic stroke. Trial Registration: anzcrt.org Identifier: ACTRN12616000942459.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.