ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Body height and the excess cancer risk in men.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Body height and the excess cancer risk in men.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Men have a higher risk than women for most cancers affecting both sexes. Since taller stature is associated with increased cancer risk and men are, on average, taller than women, we investigated to what extent adult body height, as a proxy for stem cell number, explains the elevated cancer risk in men. This population-based cohort study linked adult height information from Swedish conscripts, mothers, and passports to the National Cancer and Cause of Death Registers (1960-2011). We used mediation survival analysis to estimate the proportion of the association between male sex and site-specific cancer risk mediated by adult height, our main outcome. Statistical significance was assessed using two-sided tests with a .05 significance level. Among 6,156,659 adults, we observed 285,778 non-sex-specific cancer cases. Male sex was significantly associated with cancer risk at 33 of 39 sites, and greater height with increased risk at 27 of 39 sites. Height mediated 0.5%-100% of the excess male cancer risk, with the highest proportions for salivary gland cancer, colon cancer, melanoma, and acute myeloid leukemia. The effects of height and its mediated effect were most consistent for malignancies with weak or no established environmental risk factors. These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of the excess cancer risk in men may be explained by height. This highlights the role of stochastic biological processes linked to height, as well as genetic and early-life determinants of height, in contributing to sex differences in cancer risk, beyond influences of adult lifestyle and environmental exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.