ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Importance of age and timing of referral when initiating dialysis.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMortality of patients > 75 years of age initiating dialysis is high. Late referral to a nephrologist prior to dialysis initiation is associated with poor outcomes. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients initiating dialysis according to their age and timing of referral.
methodsWe reviewed a prospective cohort of patients initiating dialysis from 2000 to 2022 at a single university center. Primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were overall all-cause mortality and one-year hospitalization days. Late referral was defined as dialysis initiation < 1 month after a first consultation with a nephrologist.
resultsWe included 906 patients, including 246 (27%) aged over 75 years. Late referral was more common in elderly patients compared to younger ones, with rates of 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.027). Regarding one-year mortality, considering patients aged over 75 years with early referral as the reference, patients aged > 75 years with late referral were at higher risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.30, p = 0.001), while patients aged < 75 years with either early or late referral were at similar risk. Regarding overall mortality, patients aged > 75 years with late referral were at higher risk (HR 1.56, p = 0.002), while patients aged < 75 years with either early (HR 0.65, p < 0.001) or late referral (HR 0.62, p = 0.001) were at lower risk. Finally, patients aged over 75 years with late referral had more hospitalization days per year (coef 0.09, p < 0.001), while patients < 75 years with either early (coef - 0.07, p < 0.001) or late referral (coef - 0.05, p < 0.001) had fewer hospitalization days per year.
conclusionsLate referral of elderly patients prior to dialysis initiation is common and adversely associated with short- and long-term mortality as well as hospitalization days. Conversely, early referral of elderly patients is associated with a favorable short-term prognosis that is comparable to that of younger patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.