Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856976›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Rewetting drained boreal peatland forests does not mitigate climate warming in the twenty-first century.

Samuli Launiainen, Anssi Ahtikoski, Janne Rinne, Paavo Ojanen, Hannu Hökkä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuli LauniainenBioeconomy and Environment, Ecosystems and Modeling, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland. samuli.launiainen@luke.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-6573
Anssi AhtikoskiNatural Resources, Forest Management, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Tekniikankatu 1, 33720, Tampere, Finland.
Janne RinneBioeconomy and Environment, Ecosystems and Modeling, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Paavo OjanenNatural Resources, Soil Ecosystems, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Hannu HökkäNatural Resources, Forest Management, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3, 90570, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

Europen Commission Just Transition Fund, through Council of Oulu Region 2021/900302/09H2020 Excellent Science 101056921Research Council of Finland 348102Research Council of Finland 356138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rewetting drained peatland forests restores pristine ecosystem functions, improves peatland ecological status, and has been considered to mitigate climate change. We quantified climate impact of rewetting boreal peatland forests in Northern Europe by comparing the radiative forcing of alternative restoration pathways to that of continued forestry use. We considered changes in soil carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide balance, tree stand carbon sink-source dynamics, albedo change, and included the wood product carbon storage and release. We show that restoring nutrient-rich drained boreal peatland forests contributes to climate warming in the short and medium term (< 200 yr), except in specific cases when tree stand carbon storage is preserved. Rewetting nutrient-poor peatland forests has a persistent warming impact. Our results indicate the ecological benefits of rewetting drained boreal peatland forests come at a climate cost, and that restoration is unlikely to mitigate climate change within a timeframe relevant to the EU climate goals.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeForestsGlobal WarmingCarbon DioxideEuropeForestrySoilTreesCarbon DioxideSoilClimate change mitigationForest peatland restorationGreenhouse-gas balanceRadiative forcingRewetting

Identifiers

PMID40856976
PMCPMC12569233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.