ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Hamstring Injury Mechanisms and Eccentric Training-Induced Muscle Adaptations: Current Insights and Future Directions.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidation of Architectural and Compositional Factors Associated With Inter-Individual Variability in Passive Shear Modulus of the Human Vastus Lateralis in Young Healthy Males.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- Biceps femoris long-head motor unit discharge rates and recruitment thresholds vary across 9 weeks of eccentric training.Journal of sport and health science · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Factors and Prevention Strategies for Sports-Related Muscle Injuries: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Adaptations in biceps femoris long-head muscle-tendon mechanics during the Nordic hamstring exercise in response to 9 weeks of training.Journal of sport and health science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hamstring injuries are a major concern in sports owing to their high incidence and recurrence rates, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of their mechanisms and prevention. This narrative review aims to inform hamstring injury prevention strategies by examining: (1) the causes of hamstring injuries, (2) the effectiveness of eccentric training in reducing injury risk, and (3) muscle adaptations from eccentric training that may offer protective effects. Hamstring injuries often occur during the late swing phase of running, potentially due to insufficient or delayed neural activation or an inability to generate the necessary force to decelerate the leg and resist active overstretching. In this phase, the hamstrings must produce large eccentric forces while operating at long lengths, placing them in a vulnerable position. Despite the potential of eccentric training to induce muscle adaptations that may reduce injury risk, current research has overly focused on architectural changes, particularly resting fascicle lengthening, without adequately exploring how these adaptations influence the functional behavior of hamstrings during exercise. In addition, the lack of research into adaptations of non-contractile and neural elements in the hamstrings following eccentric training represents a significant gap in the literature. This review argues for a broader focus on these underexplored areas to enhance hamstring injury prevention strategies. Further research is essential to fully understand the mechanisms behind muscle fascicle lengthening after eccentric training. Exploring functional and regional differences in hamstring adaptations and delving deeper into non-contractile and neural elements could enhance injury prevention strategies, potentially reducing the incidence of hamstring injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.