Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856948›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

The effect of stress on prospective memory in robotic command and control.

Mollie R McGuire, Robert S Gutzwiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mollie R McGuireClaremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA. mrmcguir@nps.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5019-4419
Robert S GutzwillerArizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remembering to carry out an intention at the appropriate time (prospective memory-PM) requires attentional resources that may be limited in stressful circumstances. PM failures in high-risk/high stress environments, such as military operations, can have fatal consequences, and yet, the effect of stress on PM has received little attention. Prior studies that have examined stress and PM used a basic laboratory paradigm that is less applicable to high-risk/high stress environments and have not examined activity-based PM (PM that is elicited by a sequence of events), nor the combined effect of stress and divided attention. The current study examined the effects of stress and divided attention on event-based PM (PM that is elicited by environmental cues to signal the appropriate time to perform an intended action) and activity-based PM using an applied paradigm with participants remotely piloting robotic reconnaissance missions. Stress and divided attention were manipulated between subjects, and prospective memory was manipulated within subjects. The stress induction was administered prior to the execution of the tasks, with an additional noise stressor continuously on top of the tasks. Divided attention was an auditory odd-digit task during the experimental tasks. Event-based PM accuracy was unaffected by stress or divided attention. However, there was an increase in activity-based PM accuracy in the high stress condition, while no effect of divided attention was found. These results are the first to demonstrate that stress affects activity-based PM, and suggest along with prior literature that stress does not affect event-based PM.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, EpisodicRoboticsStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelYoung AdultActivity-basedEvent-basedMilitaryProspective memoryStress

Identifiers

PMID40856948
PMCPMC12381336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.