ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Comparative study of multi-headed and baseline deep learning models for ADHD classification from EEG signals.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women's Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Risk Stratification Using a Precision and Personalized Framework Embedded with an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital health technologies for adults with ADHD: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder among children is rising, emphasizing the need for early and accurate diagnostic methods to address associated academic and behavioral challenges. Electroencephalography-based analysis has emerged as a promising noninvasive approach for detecting Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; however, utilizing the full range of electroencephalography channels often results in high computational complexity and an increased risk of model overfitting. This study presents a comparative investigation between a proposed multi-headed deep learning framework and a traditional baseline single-model approach for classifying Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder using electroencephalography signals. Electroencephalography data were collected from 79 participants (42 healthy adults and 37 diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) across four cognitive states: resting with eyes open, resting with eyes closed, performing cognitive tasks, and listening to omniarmonic sounds. To reduce complexity, signals from only five strategically selected electroencephalography channels were used. The multi-headed approach employed parallel deep learning branches-comprising combinations of Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory, Long Short-Term Memory, and Gated Recurrent Unit architectures-to capture inter-channel relationships and extract richer temporal features. Comparative analysis revealed that the combination of Long Short-Term Memory and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory within the multi-headed framework achieved the highest classification accuracy of 89.87%, significantly outperforming all baseline configurations. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating multiple deep learning architectures and highlight the potential of multi-headed models for enhancing electroencephalography-based Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40856936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.