Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Short-term outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in Japanese patients with exfoliation glaucoma: a comparison with primary open-angle glaucoma using propensity score matching.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of Preserflo MicroShunt implant procedure in open‑angle glaucoma patients - a 1000 eyes case-series; including subanalysis of combined cataract-glaucoma surgery and standalone surgery in pseudophakic eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Comparison of one-year postoperative outcomes between PreserFlo MicroShunt and trabeculectomy in Japanese patients with open angle glaucoma: a retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Possible Effects of Topical Rho-Kinase Inhibitor on Schlemm's Canal Morphology Parameters.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Intraoperative 9-0 Nylon Thread Insertion for Preventing Hypotony-Related Complications Following PreserFlo MicroShunt Implantation in Japanese Patients: A Comparative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of initially implanted PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) in Japanese patients with exfoliation glaucoma (XFG). Using propensity score matching, intraocular pressure (IOP) control rates were compared between patients with XFG and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). STUDY
designRetrospective observational study.
methodsThis study reviewed 31 eyes of 31 patients with XFG who underwent initial PMS implantation with mitomycin C. IOP, medication scores, and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) were assessed preoperatively and at up to 6 months postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the 6-month survival rate, defined as an IOP reduction of > 20% from baseline and an IOP < 15 mmHg. The incidences of needling, reoperation, and complications were also assessed. IOP control was compared between XFG and propensity-score-matched POAG patients using the log-rank test.
resultsAt 6 months, the mean IOP had decreased significantly, from 22.3 ± 6.6 to 14.7 ± 6.6 mmHg, and the medication score had declined from 4.5 to 1.4. CECD decreased from 2127 to 1902 cells/mm
conclusionsPMS in Japanese patients with XFG resulted in a significant IOP reduction over 6 months, with a relatively favorable safety profile. However, its efficacy was slightly inferior to that in POAG, implying potential differences in PMS responsiveness between glaucoma subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.