SynthesisAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2025
Management of Erythrodermic Psoriasis with Systemic Therapies: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with interferon-gamma release assay positivity in patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of common Chinese herbal medicines in treating psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Erythrodermic psoriasis with early diagnostic uncertainty requiring multidisciplinary rheumatological management: A case report.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a severe and rare variant of psoriasis. Clinical features include scaling and erythema affecting more than 75% of body surface area, associated with systemic symptoms such as lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, fever, fatigue, dehydration, serum electrolyte disturbances, and tachycardia, making this condition a potentially life-threatening disease. Differential diagnosis can be challenging, encompasses atopic dermatitis, cutaneous adverse drug reaction, and advanced cutaneous lymphoma. Following a correct diagnostic framing, appropriate systemic treatment must be initiated. Unfortunately, there are no recent up-to-date guidelines and standardized treatment options for EP are still lacking.
objectiveTo review the current reported systemic treatment options for EP.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and based on a search in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for articles in English from first available publication to 9 November 2024.
resultsIn all, 145 studies were included in the review. Case reports and case series are the main available work, reporting heterogeneous outcomes and effectiveness with nonbiologic and biologic systemic agents. Among non-biologic systemic treatments, methotrexate and cyclosporin are the most widely reported as treatment for EP, showing clinical response in over 60% of cases, with cyclosporine offering a faster onset of action and being suitable for acute management. Available randomized controlled trials include patients with EP treated with etretinate, infliximab, certolizumab-pegol (CZP), Ixekizumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, and deucravacitinib. However, these trials were not specifically designed for erythrodermic psoriasis, and the sample size of EP patients included is limited, resulting in reduced statistical power and limiting the reliability of the findings. Among TNF-α inhibitors, infliximab is the most reported agent, with data on 103 patients. Certolizumab pegol (CZP) also showed promising results, with PASI 75 achieved in over 80% of patients at 52 weeks. A retrospective analysis comparing infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, and efalizumab found TNF-α inhibitors to be superior to other biologic classes. Regarding IL-17 inhibitors, secukinumab is the second most frequently studied biologic, with 93 patients reported. It demonstrated rapid efficacy, achieving PASI 75 in more than 80% of patients by week 8. A head-to-head comparison with ixekizumab showed comparable outcomes. Among IL-23 inhibitors, risankizumab led to PASI 90 in over 75% of patients at week 16, suggesting high efficacy despite more limited data.
conclusionsNon-biologic systemic drugs appear to be a rational first-line therapy, with cyclosporine showing good results in managing the acute phase and methotrexate being effective in maintaining remission. In the case of contraindications or treatment failure of traditional systemic therapies, among biologic drugs, the rapidity of action, safety, and limited evidence of efficacy are in favor of IL-17 inhibitors and risankizumab. However, the findings we report are limited by the evidence available in current literature, which is characterized by low statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.