Trial reportClinical oral investigations2025
Clinical and microbiological effectiveness of limosilactobacillus reuteri in supportive periodontal therapy: randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of the present randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of Limosilactobacillus reuteri probiotic therapy as an adjunct to Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) of patients with a history of stage III or IV and grade B or C periodontitis and residual pockets. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-four systemically healthy patients were selected. Complete periodontal assessment was performed including Pocket Probing Depth (PPD), Bleeding on Probing (BOP), Presence of supragingival plaque (PI), Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL) and Recession (REC). Two sites per patient with PPD ≥ 6 mm or PPD of 5 mm with BOP were selected in two different quadrants as test sites. A session of full-mouth debridement was provided at baseline (T0), and patients were randomized to receive a 3-weeks treatment with lozenges containing probiotic or placebo. Periodontal parameters were taken at baseline (T0), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Microbiological samples from the test sites were taken at baseline (T0), 3 weeks (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3).
resultsForty patients completed the study. Both groups showed a significant decrease in PPD, BOP, CAL, and number/percentage of residual pockets compared to baseline. However, no inter-group differences were noted. The test group showed a lower percentage of BOP at sites with plaque at T2 and T3. The microbiological analysis detected minimal proportion of L. reuteri in the periodontal pockets. No significant inter-group differences were detected in the red complex at any observation time. The subgingival microbial dysbiosis index (SMDI) revealed a decrease in dysbiosis from T0 to T1, followed by a slight increase in dysbiosis towards T3 for both groups. However, no significant differences were noted between the groups.
conclusionIn our cohort of patients, 3 weeks of bi-daily supplementation with lozenges containing L. reuteri in conjunction with a session of SPT did not provide any additional reduction in PPD or number/percentage of residual pockets and did not have a long-lasting effect on the subgingival biofilm microbial composition. However, patients receiving the probiotic had less bleeding at sites with plaque. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Whilst L. reuteri cannot be recommended as a standard adjunctive therapy in SPT, it can be considered to reduce BOP levels in patients with poor plaque control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.