Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856838›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Predicting osteoporosis-related complications in lumbar spine surgery using Hounsfield unit and vertebral bone quality scores: A 5-Year follow-up study with principal component analysis insights.

Yuki Kinoshita, Hiroshi Taniwaki, Takashi Namikawa, Akira Matsumura, Minori Kato, Yusuke Hori, Masatoshi Hoshino, Shinji Takahashi, Koji Tamai, Akinobu Suzuki and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuki KinoshitaScoliosis Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi TaniwakiScoliosis Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan. tanishi517@gmail.com.
Takashi NamikawaScoliosis Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Akira MatsumuraScoliosis Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Minori KatoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke HoriScoliosis Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masatoshi HoshinoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Shinji TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koji TamaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Akinobu SuzukiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiromitsu ToyodaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki NakamuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetomi TeraiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOsteoporosis is a well-known risk factor for incident vertebral fractures (VFs) and postoperative mechanical complications. However, the specific Hounsfield unit (HU) and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) cutoff values for predicting these complications, as well as the diagnostic and clinical significance of the differences between these two measurements, remain unclear. This study sought to evaluate the predictive value of HU and VBQ scores and to establish specific cutoff points for osteoporosis-related complications in lumbar spine surgery. Additionally, we analyzed whether combining HU and VBQ scores enhanced their predictive usefulness and whether the differences between them were clinically significant using principal component analysis (PCA).

methodsWe examined 189 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent microscopic bilateral decompression using a unilateral approach or short segmental fixation between 2010 and 2016. Patients who underwent prior lumbar surgery were excluded, and a minimum 5-year follow-up was conducted. Surgical indications were based on preoperative evaluation of segmental instability. HU values and VBQ scores were measured using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Osteoporosis-related complications, including incident VFs, and mechanical complications, such as proximal junctional fractures, cage subsidence, and screw loosening, were assessed.

resultsFor predicting osteoporosis-related complications, cutoff points of HU < 95.5 and VBQ > 3.49 were identified, both demonstrating good predictive accuracy without a significant difference in the area under the curve. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed low HU and high VBQ as independent risk factors (adjusted odds ratio = 5.57 and 3.42, respectively; p < 0.001). Additionally, PCA revealed that the concordance of these scores significantly distinguished patients with complications from those without complications (odds ratio, 3.77; p < 0.001), while the differences between these scores lacked clinical significance.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that both HU and VBQ scores effectively predicted postoperative osteoporosis-related complications, with no significant difference in predictive ability. Optimal cutoff values were identified at approximately ≤ 100 for HU and ≥ 3.5 for VBQ, and the difference between these two scores lacked clinical significance. These cut-offs for HU and VBQ can serve as practical thresholds for risk assessment, enabling spinal surgeons to use these scores as opportunistic tools for identifying patients at an elevated risk of osteoporosis-related complications after lumbar spine surgery.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeOsteoporosisPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FracturesSpinal StenosisAgedAged, 80 and overDecompression, SurgicalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedComplicationsHounsfield unitsLumbar spine surgeryOsteoporosisPrincipal component analysisVertebral bone quality score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.