ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Impact of the 2023 FIGO staging revision on MRI diagnostic accuracy in FIGO 2009 stage I endometrial cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for staging patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I endometrial cancer, by comparing the original 2009 system with the revised 2023 system. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 432 patients (mean age, 54.9 years) with histopathologically confirmed FIGO 2009 stage I endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative MRI. The patients were categorized into non-aggressive (n = 364; low-grade endometrioid histology) and aggressive (n = 68; grade 3 endometrioid or non-endometrioid histology, including serous, clear cell carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma) tumor groups. Preoperative MRI-based assessment of myometrial invasion was compared with histopathological results to assess the myometrial invasion depth, which was classified as no invasion, superficial invasion (< 50%), and deep invasion (≥ 50%). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of preoperative MRI-based staging determination were calculated for both FIGO 2009 and 2023 systems.
resultsIn non-aggressive tumors, the 2009 FIGO staging demonstrated superior accuracy (kappa 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.89) compared to the 2023 staging (kappa 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.74), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0029). MRI performance varied across invasion depths, with excellent diagnostic accuracy for deep myometrial invasion (sensitivity, 87.0%; specificity, 95.9%). For aggressive tumors, no significant difference was observed between the two staging systems (p = 0.160). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the presence of lymphovascular space invasion did not result in statistically significant differences in diagnostic agreement between MRI and pathological staging (p = 0.452).
conclusionThis study provides evidence that 2023 FIGO staging revisions present measurable challenges for MRI-based staging accuracy, particularly in the assessment of non-aggressive endometrial tumors confined to the uterus. Despite these challenges, MRI maintains reliable diagnostic performance for detecting deep myometrial invasion in uterus-confined disease, supporting its continued utility in preoperative staging protocols. KEY TAKE‑HOME: Radiologists should recognize the statistically significant reduction in diagnostic accuracy for detecting the absence of myometrial invasion under FIGO 2023 criteria, particularly in non-aggressive endometrioid tumors, and consider integrating complementary quantitative imaging parameters or molecular biomarkers to enhance the preoperative staging precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40856808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.