ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Translational challenges and clinical potential of artificial intelligence in minimally invasive surgery].
Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great potential for minimally invasive surgery, with fields of application ranging from interdisciplinary treatment stratification through preoperative planning up to active decision support in the operating room, which are the focus of this article. Artificial neural networks for analysis of surgical video recordings could enhance surgical safety, efficiency and planning. High-quality, diverse (meta)data are essential for such AI applications but the annotation, training and validation present complex demands. Despite technological advances, the clinical implementation often fails due to a lack of data standardization, insufficient infrastructure, regulatory barriers and ethical uncertainties. Many models remain black boxes, which hinders acceptance and trust among medical professionals. In addition, AI systems need to be robust, transparent and practically integrable into clinical workflows. Stringent data collection strategies, privacy-preserving learning methods, explainable AI and human-in-the-loop approaches are critical to facilitate clinical translation. Regulatory framework conditions, such as the General Data Protection Regulation, the EU Medical Device Regulation and the EU AI Act, will require further legal refinements to address the specific needs of medical AI applications and interventions, to facilitate the safe adoption of interdisciplinary assistive technologies in the operating room that meaningfully support surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.