Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856794›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Translational challenges and clinical potential of artificial intelligence in minimally invasive surgery].

Matthias Carstens, Micha Pfeiffer, Stefanie Speidel, Marius Distler, Jürgen Weitz, Fiona R Kolbinger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias CarstensKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Micha PfeifferAbteilung für Translationale Chirurgische Onkologie, Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Stefanie SpeidelAbteilung für Translationale Chirurgische Onkologie, Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Marius DistlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Jürgen WeitzKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Fiona R KolbingerKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland. fkolbing@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great potential for minimally invasive surgery, with fields of application ranging from interdisciplinary treatment stratification through preoperative planning up to active decision support in the operating room, which are the focus of this article. Artificial neural networks for analysis of surgical video recordings could enhance surgical safety, efficiency and planning. High-quality, diverse (meta)data are essential for such AI applications but the annotation, training and validation present complex demands. Despite technological advances, the clinical implementation often fails due to a lack of data standardization, insufficient infrastructure, regulatory barriers and ethical uncertainties. Many models remain black boxes, which hinders acceptance and trust among medical professionals. In addition, AI systems need to be robust, transparent and practically integrable into clinical workflows. Stringent data collection strategies, privacy-preserving learning methods, explainable AI and human-in-the-loop approaches are critical to facilitate clinical translation. Regulatory framework conditions, such as the General Data Protection Regulation, the EU Medical Device Regulation and the EU AI Act, will require further legal refinements to address the specific needs of medical AI applications and interventions, to facilitate the safe adoption of interdisciplinary assistive technologies in the operating room that meaningfully support surgical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTranslational Research, BiomedicalHumansNeural Networks, ComputerVideo RecordingArtificial neuronal networksBlack boxesClinical translationDeep learningRegulatory framework conditions

Identifiers

PMID40856794
PMCPMC12552326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.