Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856778›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Use of centrally and femorally inserted central venous catheters in neonates: a nationwide survey of practices in French neonatal intensive care units.

Penelope Lanel, Martin Bonnel, Baptiste Teillet, Claire Bellanger, Elsa Kermorvant-Duchemin, Alexandre Lapillonne, Victor Sartorius

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Penelope LanelDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Martin BonnelDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Baptiste TeilletDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Claire BellangerDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Elsa Kermorvant-DucheminDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Alexandre LapillonneDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Victor SartoriusDepartment of neonatal intensive care, Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris, France. victor.sartorius@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the use of centrally and femorally inserted central catheters (CICCs and FICCs, respectively) in French neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to describe associated clinical practices. We conducted a national cross-sectional survey targeting all level III or higher NICUs in France. A link to an online questionnaire was sent to one member of the medical team in each unit between September and December 2024. CICCs were defined as central catheters inserted via the brachiocephalic or the internal jugular vein, and FICCs as central catheters inserted via the common femoral vein. All 65 NICUs participated in the survey. Of these, 45 (69.2%) reported performing CICC or FICC placements. Specifically, 35 (53.8%), 39 (60.0%), and 37 (56.9%) units performed insertions via the brachiocephalic vein, internal jugular vein, and common femoral vein, respectively. In most units, CICC/FICCs were used most frequently (n = 20) or systematically (n = 18) as a second-line option after an epicutaneo-caval catheter had been considered. In units that use CICC/FICCs, placement was performed by a NICU physician in 39 (86.7%) of them. In most cases, the catheter was placed under conscious sedation when feasible. The median minimum patient weight [interquartile range] considered suitable for central catheter placement was 1500 [800-2000] grams for brachiocephalic catheters, 1500 [900-2000] grams for internal jugular catheters, and 1650 [800-2000] grams for common femoral catheters. Very small caliber catheters (1 or 2 French in diameter) and a modified Seldinger insertion technique were used in 23 and 17 units, respectively.

conclusionCICC/FICCs use is part of clinical practice in most French NICUs, mainly as a second-line option. Indications for use, placement techniques, and maintenance protocols vary across units. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Previous studies from specialized centers have shown that centrally and femorally inserted central catheters (CICC/FICCs) can be safely inserted in neonates. •It is still unclear to what extent these practices have been implemented in neonatal intensive care units. WHAT IS NEW: • CICC/FICCs are now part of clinical practice in the majority of French NICUs. • The median minimum weight for CICC/FICC insertion was approximately 1500 g, indicating that their use has extended to smaller, more vulnerable infants. Very small-diameter catheters combined with a modified insertion technique enhance compatibility with neonatal vasculature.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersCritical CareIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Brachiocephalic VeinsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFemoral VeinFranceHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornJugular VeinsMaleCentral Venous CathetersIntensive Care UnitsNewborn

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.