Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Alexander Q CusumanoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
Braden C ChaffinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
David A CaganDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Arthur Amos Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4719-2789
Stephen DiLuzioDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Arthur Amos Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Erica SutcliffeDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Arthur Amos Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Ryan G HadtDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Arthur Amos Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-1358
Abigail G DoyleDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6641-0833
Funding
New Directions in Nickel and Photoredox CatalysisR35GM126986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Abigail Gutmann Doyle · 2018 to 2026
$3.7M
Understanding Geometric and Electronic Structure Contributions to Ground and Excited State Cu- and Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling ReactionsR35GM142595 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HADT, RYAN G · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NMR Console and Prodigy CryoProbeS10OD028644 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GARG, NEIL K · 2021 to 2021
$600k
Development of excited-state bond homolysis as a key step for Ni catalysisF32GM151836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CUSUMANO, ALEXANDER · 2023 to 2024
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.