ReviewHERD2026
Designing for Well-Being in Pediatric Patients Scheduled for Surgery.
Review in HERD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesChildren scheduled for surgery and anesthesia often experience fear and anxiety before the procedure, as well as pain afterward. While medical treatments are essential for managing these challenges, design strategies that positively influence environmental and psychological factors can significantly improve children's experiences and their overall subjective well-being. This narrative literature review examines "design for well-being" strategies that support the subjective well-being of children undergoing surgical procedures.BackgroundAccording to the World Health Organization, health is defined not merely as the absence of disease but as a state of complete physical and mental well-being. Achieving such well-being requires not only medical care but also the optimization of environmental and psychological conditions that impact emotional states. Today, evidence-based, multidisciplinary approaches are recommended to promote well-being. In health-related design, one focus is on improving the quality of medical care, while another addresses non-medical factors that influence subjective well-being.MethodsThis research employs a non-systematic literature review methodology, utilizing existing literature and evidence-based approaches to synthesize relevant strategies.ResultsEnhancing subjective well-being-through evidence-based design strategies such as age-appropriate environmental modifications, sensory-friendly elements, and interactive distraction tools-alongside optimized medical practices in pediatric surgeries contributes to improved clinical outcomes and reduced perioperative stress. The review highlights "design for well-being" strategies, which effectively support the subjective well-being of children undergoing surgical procedures.ConclusionsEmphasizing "design for well-being" strategies is crucial for enhancing the overall experiences and well-being of children undergoing surgery. Future research should focus on the implementation and long-term impact of these design interventions to further validate their effectiveness and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.