ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
In Vivo Safety Evaluation of Acoustic Radiation Force for Optical Coherence Elastography of the Crystalline Lens.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical multimodal Brillouin microscopy-optical coherence elastography system for lens biomechanics.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety of acoustic radiation force (ARF) for in vivo lens biomechanics measurement in rabbits. Methods: Twelve New Zealand albino white rabbits were exposed to acoustic radiation force at intensities exceeding the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended safety limits by 8 to 14 times. A spherically focused 3.5-MHz ARF transducer created deformations on the lens surface, which was imaged using a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography system during the ARF application. Intraocular pressure measurements and ocular health assessments using slit-lamp and OCT imaging were conducted pre- and postexposure over 3 weeks. Results: Hyperemia was observed in two rabbits immediately postexposure but resolved within 24 hours. No substantial changes in intraocular pressure were detected, and both slit-lamp examination and optical coherence tomography imaging showed normal ocular health across all groups after the follow-up period. Conclusions: ARF is a potentially safe technique for assessing the biomechanical properties of the lens in vivo. No eye damage was observed, even when ARF was applied at intensities well above FDA regulatory limits. Translational Relevance: This study is an important step toward the translation of the technology for ARF elastography of the crystalline lens, for studies on the mechanism of presbyopia, and to enable the assessment of new presbyopia treatments relying on lens softening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.