ArticleThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology2025
Characteristics of Brazilian dental malpractice lawsuits in 2022 and 2023.
Article in The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A survey was conducted of the dental professional liability cases adjudicated (post-appeal) throughout the Brazilian territory during the years 2022 and 2023. Data was retrieved from the Jusbrasil website (www.jusbrasil.com.br), and the characteristics of the lawsuits were assessed and compared with those reported in previous studies. The query entered into the "case law search" field was "dental professional liability". An assessment was conducted of 472 rulings referring to 2022 and 447 rulings referring to 2023 in which the dentist was convicted in 61% and 68% of the cases, respectively. There was no increase in the number of cases between the years included in the assessment; however, an increase did occur in the number of cases when compared to that reported in another methodologically similar study. An expert's report was solicited by the court in 75% of the cases. The most frequently involved specialties were implant dentistry and prosthodontics, and there was a tendency toward an increase in lawsuits involving companies as opposed to individuals. The amounts awarded for moral and aesthetic damages ranged from US$ 299.00 to US$ 19,960.00. The highest mean value awarded for moral damages involved the specialty of oral & maxillofacial surgery and traumatology, whereas the lowest mean value was associated with restorative dentistry. The amount most frequently awarded in convictions across the two years included in the survey was US$ 1,954.00. The adoption of preventive measures can potentially reduce the number of new cases, convictions and financial losses resulting from civil liability lawsuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.