ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Combining Detailed Fetal Anatomy Scanning in the NT Window Versus Early Second Trimester Scanning at 14-16 Weeks: A Non-Inferiority Study.
Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of fetal anatomy in the first trimester on a national scale: screening and beyond.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Article
- Evolution of Doppler ultrasound in obstetric imaging: a slow(flow) step forward.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFirst-trimester ultrasound has evolved to incorporate a detailed fetal anatomy scan (FAS) with nuchal translucency (NT) screening. Many institutions use a 2-visit protocol: NT followed by detailed FAS at 14-16 weeks. We aimed to evaluate whether integrating detailed FAS into the NT window (12 + 5 to 13 + 6 weeks) is non-inferior in diagnostic yield to the 2-visit protocol.
methodsWe enrolled 755 mixed high- and low-risk pregnant women with singleton gestations into either integrated NT + FAS group (n = 243, 12 + 5 to 13 + 6 weeks) or 2-visit group (n = 512, 14-16 weeks). All underwent follow-up at 20-24 weeks. Scans followed ISUOG guidelines; the primary outcome was detection of fetal anomalies during detailed early scans. Non-inferiority was defined as a margin of ≤6% difference in detection rates.
resultsStudy groups were similar except in parity (mean 2.6 [0-9] vs. 3.1 [0-10], P = .0081 in FAS + NT and 2-visit group, respectively). Anomalies were identified in 16 fetuses (7.5%) in the NT + FAS group and 16 (3%) in the 2-visit group (P = .033). Additional anomalies were detected at mid-trimester in 2/227 (0.9%) NT + FAS and 4/496 (0.8%) 2-visit group fetuses (P = 1.0). The integrated approach met non-inferiority criteria.
conclusionDetailed FAS during the final NT window week is non-inferior to the 2-visit approach. This integrated protocol offers earlier reassurance without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.