Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856379›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025

Association between trunk aesthetics and underling scoliosis severity and curve type in adolescents: evaluation of traditional clinical scores and novel automated indices from rasterstereographic imaging.

Tito Bassani, Alessandra Negrini, Marco Rampi, Maria Parzini, Stefano Negrini

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tito BassaniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy - tito.bassani@grupposandonato.it.
Alessandra NegriniISICO Italian Scientific Spine Institute, Milan, Italy.
Marco RampiISICO Italian Scientific Spine Institute, Milan, Italy.
Maria ParziniISICO Italian Scientific Spine Institute, Milan, Italy.
Stefano NegriniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrunk aesthetics is an important aim in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). While subjective measures like the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire are commonly used, objective methods, such as the Trunk Aesthetic Clinical Evaluation (TRACE) index, are less explored. Non-invasive imaging techniques like rasterstereography (RST) have been studied to reduce radiographic exposure in AIS, though their correlation with Cobb angles remains weak. Notwithstanding, RST provides detailed trunk shape information that could enhance aesthetic evaluations.

aimTo evaluate the correlation between aesthetic indices (TRACE and novel automated RST-based) and radiographic characteristics.

designCross-sectional observational controlled diagnostic study.

settingOutpatient rehabilitation center for conservative treatment of spinal deformities. POPULATION: 675 AIS subjects (age 13±2 years; Cobb angles 10-45°) with trunk photographs, RST scans, and standing radiographs within three months.

methodsTwo automated RST aesthetic evaluations (l_match and l_dist) were developed based on TRACE principles, providing total and sub-scores for shoulders, scapulae, hemithorax, and waist. TRACE assessments on RST images and photographs were conducted by two raters, with intra- and inter-rater reliability tested in a subset of 28 participants. Correlations among TRACE (photographic and RST), automated RST evaluations, scoliosis severity, and curve type were analyzed.

resultsTRACE confirmed strong intra-rater (0.73-0.96) and moderate inter-rater (0.61-0.74) reliability. Correlations between aesthetic measures were weak: RST and photographic TRACE (0.3 overall, 0.02-0.4 sub-scores), and RST TRACE with automated evaluations (0.27-0.28 overall, 0.06-0.29 sub-scores). Correlations between Cobb angles and aesthetic evaluations ranged from weak to moderate: RST TRACE (0.35-0.42), photographic TRACE (0.13-0.53), l_match (-0.05 to -0.44), and l_dist (0.03-0.49). Waist sub-scores showed strongest correlations in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves, with thoracic curves yielding best results for automated RST evaluations.

conclusionsThe new automated RST-based aesthetic evaluation did not show clear superiority on TRACE. In the current absence of a gold standard, choices should prioritize reliability, validity, and clinical utility. Aesthetic and radiographic evaluations were weakly correlated but showed consistent patterns across trunk areas and curve types, highlighting the multifactorial nature of scoliosis-related aesthetics warranting further exploration. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: While the development of robust tools to assess aesthetics beyond radiography is ongoing, TRACE remains a reliable and cost-effective instrument for routine clinical use.

Indexed as

EstheticsScoliosisTorsoAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID40856379
PMCPMC12409360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.