Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856378›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025

Specialized orthotic care to improve functioning in adults with neuromuscular disorders: results of an open-label blinded end-point randomized controlled trial.

Elza VAN Duijnhoven, Fieke S Koopman, Jana Tuijtelaars, Viola Altmann, Johanna M VAN Dongen, Manon Janse, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elza VAN DuijnhovenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Fieke S KoopmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jana TuijtelaarsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Viola AltmannKlimmendaal, Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Johanna M VAN DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Manon JanseReade Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frans NolletDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Merel-Anne BrehmDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands - m.a.brehm@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with neuromuscular disorders (NMD) are often provided with lower limb orthoses to improve walking. Guideline-based provision of lower limb orthoses in expert settings (i.e. specialized orthotic care) may improve treatment outcomes by better matching the orthotic properties to address walking problems in neuromuscular disorders (NMD).

aimWe assessed the (cost)-effectiveness of specialized orthotic care compared to usual orthotic care in adults with NMD.

designRandomized controlled trial with an economic evaluation.

settingOutpatient rehabilitation settings. POPULATION: Adults with plantar flexor and/or quadriceps weakness due to NMD with an indication for a lower limb orthosis.

methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to specialized orthotic care (N.=31), or usual orthotic care (N.=30). Primary endpoints were personal goal attainment (at 24 weeks follow-up), and walking energy cost at comfortable speed (change from baseline to 24 weeks follow-up). Secondary endpoints included comfortable walking speed, spatiotemporal gait parameters, gait biomechanics, stability, physical functioning, (fear of) falling, fatigue and satisfaction.

resultsPersonal goal attainment was significantly higher for specialized orthotic care (P=0.011). Walking energy cost did not differ between groups (P=0.140) but decreased significantly with -11.8% (-0.55 J/kg/m; 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.11) following specialized, but not following usual orthotic care (-0.08 J/kg/m; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.26). Secondarily, changes in step length, walking speed, physical functioning, and satisfaction were in favor of specialized orthotic care (P≤0.042). Specialized orthotic care was likely cost-effective from a societal and healthcare perspective.

conclusionsSpecialized orthotic care was beneficial in attaining personal goals, and likely cost-effective compared to usual orthotic care. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Guideline-based provision of lower limb orthoses in expert settings could enhance functioning of adults with NMD and generate societal cost savings.

Indexed as

Neuromuscular DiseasesOrthotic DevicesAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeWalking

Identifiers

PMID40856378
PMCPMC12405948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.