ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2025
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF) Among Chinese Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF) Among Chinese Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo revise the Brief Body Perception Questionnaire (BPQ-SF) for applicability in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), and to examine its reliability and psychometric characteristics.
methodsIn Sample 1 (n = 371), items from the two subscales of the BPQ-SF were revised using expert consultation and item analysis, followed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Sample 2 (n = 350) was used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and for evaluating structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity.
resultsThe revised BPQ-SF consists of 30 items across two subscales: Body Awareness (15 items) and Autonomic Reactivity (15 items). The scale demonstrated good structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The total score was significantly and positively correlated with anxiety as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) (r = 0.368, p < 0.01).
conclusionThe revised BPQ-SF shows sound reliability and validity in hospitalized patients with CHD and serves as a reliable tool for assessing interoceptive sensitivity and emotional states. It offers a valuable measurement basis for the early detection and intervention of anxiety in patients with coronary heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.