Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856273›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2025

Combining Observations and Models: A Review of the CARDAMOM Framework for Data-Constrained Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling.

Matthew A Worden, T Eren Bilir, A Anthony Bloom, Jianing Fang, Lily P Klinek, Alexandra G Konings, Paul A Levine, David T Milodowski, Gregory R Quetin, T Luke Smallman and 21 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Matthew A WordenDepartment of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0414-4187
T Eren BilirJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9465-9313
A Anthony BloomJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1486-1499
Jianing FangDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-5797
Lily P KlinekDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3923-7406
Alexandra G KoningsDepartment of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2810-1722
Paul A LevineJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1248-6920
David T MilodowskiSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8419-8506
Gregory R QuetinDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7884-5332
T Luke SmallmanSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0835-1003
Yinon M Bar-OnDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8477-609X
Renato K BraghiereJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-717X
Cédric H DavidJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0924-5907
Nina A FischerSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-3054
Pierre GentineDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-8345
Tim J GreenSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4223-9485
Ayanna JonesDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-3408
Junjie LiuJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7184-6594
Marcos LongoClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5062-6245
Shuang MaJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6494-724X
Troy S MagneyDepartment of Forest Management, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-0024
Elias C MassoudOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1772-5361
Vasileios MyrgiotisUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Midlothian, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6163-9797
Alexander J NortonResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7708-3914
Nick ParazooJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-7780
Elahe TajfarJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8023-4154
Anna T TrugmanDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-9711
Mathew WilliamsSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6117-5208
Sarah WordenJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6849-2377
Wenli ZhaoDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-1692
Songyan ZhuSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6899-9920

Funding

Alfred P. Sloan FoundationCalifornia Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 8GG20808Division of Environmental Biology 1942133Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology 80NSSC21K1593Jet Propulsion LaboratoryNASANASA Carbon Cycle ScienceNational Centre for Earth ObservationNational Science Foundation 2003205Natural Environment Research Council NE/X019071/1Resnick Sustainability Institute for Science, Energy and Sustainability, California Institute of TechnologyRUBISCO Science Focus Area KP1703SECO: Resolving the current and future carbon dynamics of the dry tropicsUK EO Climate Information ServiceUS Department of Energy Office of ScienceUSDI Park Service P24AC00910UT-Battelle DE-AC05-00OR22725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid increase in the volume and variety of terrestrial biosphere observations (i.e., remote sensing data and in situ measurements) offers a unique opportunity to derive ecological insights, refine process-based models, and improve forecasting for decision support. However, despite their potential, ecological observations have primarily been used to benchmark process-based models, as many past and current models lack the capability to directly integrate observations and their associated uncertainties for parameterization. In contrast, data assimilation frameworks such as the CARbon DAta MOdel fraMework (CARDAMOM) and its suite of process-based models, known as the Data Assimilation Linked Ecosystem Carbon Model (DALEC), are specifically designed for model-data fusion. This review, motivated by a recent CARDAMOM community workshop, examines the development and applications of CARDAMOM, with an emphasis on its role in advancing ecosystem process understanding. CARDAMOM employs a Bayesian approach, using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to enable data-driven calibration of DALEC parameters and initial states (i.e., carbon pool sizes) through observation operators. CARDAMOM's unique ability to retrieve localized model process parameters from diverse datasets-ranging from in situ measurements to global satellite observations-makes it a highly flexible tool for analyzing spatially variable ecosystem responses to environmental change. However, assimilating these data also presents challenges, including data quality issues that propagate into model skill, as well as trade-offs between model complexity, parameter equifinality, and predictive performance. We discuss potential solutions to these challenges, such as reducing parameter equifinality by incorporating new observations. This review also offers community recommendations for incorporating emerging datasets, integrating machine learning techniques, strengthening collaboration with remote sensing, field, and modeling communities, and expanding CARDAMOM's relevance for localized ecosystem monitoring and decision-making. CARDAMOM enables a deep, mechanistic understanding of terrestrial ecosystem dynamics that cannot be achieved through empirical analyses of observational datasets or weakly constrained models alone.

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, TheoreticalBayes TheoremCarbonRemote Sensing TechnologyCarbonBayesian inferenceCARDAMOMDALECdata assimilationdata‐constrained modelmodel‐data fusion

Identifiers

PMID40856273
PMCPMC12379577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.