Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856184›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Adaptive Mechanical Metamaterials with On-Demand Binary Local Modulus for Embodied Intelligence.

Richard J Nash, Yunzheng Yang, Yaning Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard J NashDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Yunzheng YangDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Yaning LiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-7900

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation 2414457National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation CMMI-2140223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological materials in nature are inherently adaptive, evolving through continuous interaction with their environment. Achieving such adaptability and self-optimization in artificial materials remains a major challenge. In this work, a simple yet robust mechanism is introduced that enables instantaneous changes in local stiffness components in response to strain. This is realized by designing binary meta-capsules with two discrete states 0 and 1, each corresponding to a different modulus in one direction. These strain-responsive capsules switch states based on applied deformation, serving as the building blocks for a new class of adaptive mechanical metamaterials (AMMs). Computational tools are developed to guide the design, and selected structures are fabricated via multi-material polymer jetting. Mechanical experiments, including compression and indentation tests, confirm the functionality of the AMMs. Because the stiffness change in each meta-capsule is reversible, the material can reconfigure itself after loading-unloading cycle. This enables AMMs to dynamically adjust their local properties based on external loads and/or constraints, effectively "reprogramming" or redesigning themselves post-fabrication, paving the way for transforming 3D/4D printing into adaptive, "infinity-D" printing.

Indexed as

adaptive materialsadditive manufacturingembodied intelligencemechanical metamaterialson‐demand

Identifiers

PMID40856184
PMCPMC12561258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.