Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40856178›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Effects of antibiotic prophylaxis during labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women planning vaginal birth.

Daichi Suzuki, Noyuri Yamaji, Etsuko Nishimura, Hitomi Suzuki, Kazuhiro Ishikawa, Md Obaidur Rahman, Maureen Makama, Joshua P Vogel, Erika Ota

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daichi SuzukiDepartment of Global Health Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Noyuri YamajiInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Etsuko NishimuraFaculty of Nursing, Komazawa Women's University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitomi SuzukiGraduate School of International Healthcare and Midwifery, Japanese Red Cross College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro IshikawaDepartment of Infectious Disease, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Md Obaidur RahmanDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan Institute for Health Security, Tokyo, Japan.
Maureen MakamaWomen's, Children's and Adolescents' Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Joshua P VogelWomen's, Children's and Adolescents' Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Erika OtaDepartment of Global Health Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3945-7441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMaternal sepsis is the third leading cause of maternal mortality globally. However, the risk of maternal sepsis can be reduced by administering antibiotics prophylactically before infection occurs. Previous research has assessed the effects of azithromycin prophylaxis during pregnancy, but evidence is lacking on the effects of other types of antibiotics, and the potential for antimicrobial resistance.

objectivesTo assess the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis in women in labour after 28 weeks' gestation on the prevention of maternal and neonatal infections and mortality. SEARCH

methodsWe used CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, one other database, and two trial registries, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify eligible studies. We did not restrict the search by publication type or language. The latest search date was 30 July 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials involving pregnant women in labour after 28 gestational weeks, comparing any antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no treatment. We included trials of women anticipating a vaginal delivery, irrespective of baseline risk factors (unselected, lower-risk, or higher-risk), and without an indication for antibiotic prophylaxis in any care setting. We excluded trials that enroled only women with a planned caesarean section or a known bacterial infection (such as group B Streptococcus), and trials evaluating antibiotics for treatment rather than prevention. OUTCOMES: Our key outcomes of interest, as presented in the summary of findings table, were: incidence of maternal sepsis, maternal mortality, neonatal sepsis, neonatal mortality, wound infection (perineal), adverse effects of antibiotics, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. RISK OF BIAS: We used the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) to assess the risk of bias. SYNTHESIS

methodsWe synthesised results for each outcome using random-effects meta-analysis in Review Manager. Meta-analyses were conducted using the inverse-variance method for dichotomous and continuous outcomes. We used a narrative synthesis following the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) reporting guideline for outcomes that could not be pooled statistically due to heterogeneity or limited data. We summarised key findings from individual studies descriptively and structured by outcome domain. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included four trials with 42,846 participants (21,501 in the intervention groups versus 21,345 in the control groups). All were individually randomised trials conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Three trials used a single oral dose of azithromycin in the intervention group, while the fourth used a combination of azithromycin and amoxicillin. All four trials used a placebo control. SYNTHESIS OF

resultsWe judged three trials to have an overall low risk of bias, and the remaining trial to be at 'some concerns', due to reporting bias. Below, we report on the key outcomes of interest, as presented in the summary of findings table. Compared to placebo, any antibiotic use: • probably reduces maternal sepsis (1.8% in the placebo group versus 1.2% in the antibiotic group; risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.77; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsOffering a single oral dose of prophylactic antibiotics to pregnant women in labour after 28 gestational weeks or more probably reduces maternal sepsis. It likely results in little to no difference in maternal mortality, and results in little to no difference in neonatal sepsis, neonatal mortality, perineal wound infection, and NICU admission. Evidence on antimicrobial resistance is very uncertain: short-term increases in resistant organisms were observed in some maternal samples, but no persisting between-group differences were found at 11 to 13 months' follow-up. Implementation should be cautious and accompanied by antimicrobial stewardship and AMR surveillance, and future research should better quantify AMR effects and identify optimal antibiotic strategies.

fundingThis work was partially funded by UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a co-sponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and partially supported by JST Grant Number JPMJPF2108. REGISTRATION: Registration: PROSPERO (2024) CRD42024582129.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisLabor, ObstetricPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSepsisAzithromycinBiasDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID40856178
PMCPMC12378836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.