ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2025
Effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based second-line therapy following cetuximab+FOLFIRI or bevacizumab+FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer without primary tumor resection.
Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) poses challenges for treatment optimization. Effective first-line targeted therapies are crucial for improving outcomes, particularly when combined with second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies. This study examined the effects of first-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI versus bevacizumab+FOLFIRI, followed by second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, on survival among patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC without primary tumor resection (PTR).
methodsA retrospective analysis of Taiwanese data (2013-2019) included patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable mCRC who received first-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI or bevacizumab+FOLFIRI, followed by second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Survival outcomes-overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD)-were compared between these regimens using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for potential confounders, followed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to account for clinical and biological variables.
resultsIn patients without PTR, first-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI with second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved OS from the start dates of first- and second-line treatment compared to first-line bevacizumab+FOLFIRI with second-line oxaliplatin-based therapy, yielding adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.78) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.42-0.73), respectively. No significant difference in TTD was observed (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.04).
conclusionsFirst-line cetuximab+FOLFIRI followed by second-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy offers superior OS compared to bevacizumab+FOLFIRI followed by second-line oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy in KRAS wild-type mCRC without PTR. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment sequencing, highlighting the need for further research to optimize mCRC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.