Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855889›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference

Bridging the Scientific Knowledge Gap and Reproducibility: A Survey of Provenance, Assertion and Evidence Ontologies.

Tek Raj Chhetri, Yaroslav O Halchenko, Dorota Jarecka, Puja Trivedi, Satrajit S Ghosh, Patrick Ray, Lydia Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tek Raj ChhetriMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yaroslav O HalchenkoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Dorota JareckaMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Puja TrivediMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Satrajit S GhoshMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Patrick RayAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lydia NgAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Yaroslav O Halchenko · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
DANDI: Distributed Archives for Neurophysiology Data IntegrationR24MH117295 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Satrajit Sujit Ghosh, Yaroslav O Halchenko · 2019 to 2026
$11.6M
An extensible brain knowledge base and toolset spanning modalities for multi-species data-driven cell typesU24MH130918 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI Satrajit Sujit Ghosh, Michael Hawrylycz · 2022 to 2026
$10.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH117295NIMH NIH HHS U24 MH130918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of scientific publications and evolving experimental paradigms create significant challenges in staying up-to-date with current advances. Assertions are often unstructured and have limited provenance, which hinders reproducibility. Ontologies and knowledge graphs (KGs) offer structured solutions by capturing assertions, evidence, and provenance to support reproducibility. This paper reviews 23 ontologies - 13 focused on assertions and evidence and 10 on provenance - providing an overview of the current landscape while highlighting key challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Indexed as

Assertion and Evidence OntologyKnowledge Discovery and IntegrationKnowledge GraphsOntology SurveyProvenanceReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID40855889
PMCPMC12376154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.