ArticleAnnals of 3D printed medicine2025
Impact of dry heat sterilization on the mechanical and functional performance of 3D printed medical devices for image-guided intervention.
Article in Annals of 3D printed medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polymer additive manufacturing (AM) is a powerful method for medical device prototyping, producing low-cost medical devices for resource limited settings and patient-specific customization. Plastic medical devices created with AM must undergo sterilization prior to in vivo experiments or use with patients. While prior studies have verified the feasibility and safety of sterilization of such devices, the impact on mechanical performance has not been studied. Temperatures during autoclave sterilization, a commonly used and widely available method, can match or exceed the melt temperature of Nylon-12 used for selective laser sintering. Here we tested the impact of single or multiple cycles of autoclave sterilization on the mechanical and functional performance of plastic components used with interventional radiology related medical devices (catheter hub, ablation probe handle, and implantable port). We found that up to 2 cycles of sterilization did not tangibly impact the manufacturability, function or surface finish of these devices. However, we found that more than one cycle of sterilization can compromise the mechanical strength of the devices, with geometric-linked variations in the level of change in stiffness (ranging from 12 - 23 %). In conclusion, autoclave sterilization is safe for single use AM medical devices, where repetition of the sterilization for device reuse can compromise mechanical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.