ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- )2024
Sentence-Aligned Simplification of Biomedical Abstracts.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lessons from the TREC Plain Language Adaptation of Biomedical Abstracts (PLABA) track.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The availability of biomedical abstracts in online databases could improve health literacy and drive more informed choices. However, the technical language of these documents makes them inaccessible to healthcare consumers, causing disengagement, frustration and potential misuse. In this work we explore adapting foundation language models to the Plain Language Adaptation of Biomedical Abstracts benchmark. This task is challenging because it requires sentence-by-sentence simplifications, but entire abstracts must also be simplified cohesively. We present a sentence-wise autoregressive approach and report experiments with this technique in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings, using both proprietary and open-source models. We also introduce a stochastic regularization technique to encourage recovery from source-copying during autoregressive inference. Our best-performing model achieves a 32 point increase in SARI and 6 point increase in BERTscore over the reported state-of-the-art. This also surpasses performance of recent open-domain and biomedical sentence simplification models on this task. Further, in manual evaluation, models achieve factual accuracy comparable to human-level, with simplicity close to that of humans. Abstracts simplified by these models could unlock a massive source of health information while retaining clear provenance for each statement to enhance trustworthiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.