ReviewInternational immunology2026
TCR representation learning with protein language models: a comprehensive review.
Review in International immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The challenge and promise of studying human antigen-specific T cells.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning for TCR Repertoire Epitope Annotation and Pattern Discovery.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is a valuable source of information that reflects an individual's immune status and infection history. However, due to the exceptional diversity and complexity of the TCR repertoire, predicting its functional properties remains a challenging task. This review summarizes recent advances in protein language models (PLMs), which apply natural language processing techniques to protein sequences, focusing specifically on TCR repertoire analysis. We begin by outlining the biological basis of the TCR repertoire and its current clinical applications. We then describe the methods used for representing TCR data and the training procedures of the corresponding PLMs. PLMs capture context-dependent features from large unlabeled TCR datasets and achieve high generalization performance even with limited labeled data through transfer learning. In this respect, PLMs offer significant advantages over conventional sequence representation methods. We highlight antigen specificity prediction as a key application, comparing supervised deep learning models with PLM-based approaches. While employment of PLMs is promising, TCR repertoire analysis still faces challenges such as data scarcity, bias, and lack of paired-chain information. Addressing these challenges requires rigorous dataset optimization, integration, and augmentation strategies. Future advances will require better interpretation of the representations learned by PLMs and the development of multimodal approaches that integrate structural information. These advances could enable several clinical applications, including disease diagnosis, vaccine development, and personalized immune profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.