ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessment of understanding, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding osteoporosis among postgraduate students in China.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile medical postgraduates should possess strong osteoporosis knowledge to improve public health, data on their knowledge and practices are lacking in China. This study compares osteoporosis-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices between professional-degree (clinical) and academic-degree (research) medical postgraduates.
methodsA structured 14-item questionnaire regarding knowledge of osteoporosis, awareness and education level, and clinical practices related osteoporosis was electronically distributed to 97 postgraduates. Data analysis was performed using R software, with the Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test at a significance level of p < 0.05.
resultsProfessional-degree students showed better familiarity with osteoporosis symptoms/diagnosis (p < 0.05) and more clinical training. Academic-degree students preferred literature review (vs. professional students’ internet use) and focused more on etiology. Clinical practice engagement was higher in professional-degree students.
conclusionsDespite knowledge gaps, both groups showed positive learning attitudes. Tailored education for each track could enhance osteoporosis prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.