SynthesisBMC public health2025
Perceptions on mental health and depression by adolescents, a systematic review of qualitative studies.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Context and Needs of Adolescents Experiencing Subclinical Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Wales: Document Analysis and Qualitative Data Collection.School mental health · 2026Article
- Physical activity and health-related quality of life among Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional statistical path model involving sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health issues are on the rise, affecting one in seven adolescents. Depression stands out as the most prevalent mood disorder. Enhancing our understanding of adolescent' perspectives on mental health can improve prevention and promotion efforts. Reviews on mental health of adolescents mainly relied on studies with questionnaires and diagnostic tools. This qualitative systematic review aims to give an overview of the perspectives on mental health expressed by adolescents aged 13-23 in high-income countries on mental health and depression.
methodWe searched in Pubmed and Psychinfo databases using terms including synonyms of adolescent, mental health or depression, perspectives and qualitative methods. A total of 34,074 records were screened for eligibility. Included articles were thematically analyzed in three stages: open coding, development of 'descriptive themes' and the generation of 'analytical themes'.
resultsWe found 74 articles eligible for the synthesis and identified five themes: (1) Importance of maintaining balance for positive mental health, (2) Need for connection with oneself and others to cope with daily stressors, (3) Personal responsibility for their mental health, (4) Mental (un)health is perceived as a continuum, (5) Losing control is key for depression.
conclusionThis review provides a comprehensive exploration of the literature on adolescent' perceptions on mental health and depression. Mental health issues are perceived as personal failure. Adolescents shoulder responsibility for their own mental health, while simultaneously expressing the need for social support. Recognizing adolescents' active role presents opportunities for empowering interventions and support, it also amplifies the perceived burden of responsibility making them susceptible to depression. Our results suggest the need for systemic and collective interventions rather than solely individual-focused interventions. It is necessary to further study adolescents' perceptions of mental health and depression, to promote their mental health, prevent mental health problems and stimulate seeking (professional) help when in need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.