ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Comparison of biparameter and multiparameter MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer across PSA stratifications.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel Voxel-Based MRI Risk Score LADCTCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe comparative diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) versus multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) continues to be debated. This study aimed to compare mpMRI and bpMRI in detecting csPCa across prostate-specific antigen (PSA) strata and identify supplementary tools comparable to dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging.
methodsImages were evaluated using mpMRI-based mp-PI-RADS and bpMRI-based bp-PI-RADS and simplified PI-RADS (S-PI-RADS) schemes. The lesion volume (LV) was manually segmented by a radiologist using ITK-SNAP software on high b-value DWI images. The diagnostic performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The differences of T2WI-score, DCE assessment and LV between csPCa and non-csPCa in peripheral zone (PZ) with DWI category 3 were compared.
resultsFor overall PSA, mp-PI-RADS and bp-PI-RADS showed comparable AUCs (0.889 vs. 0.882; P > 0.05). When PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, mp-PI-RADS exhibited the highest specificity (91.0% vs. bp-PI-RADS: 64.4%, S-PI-RADS: 75.0%) and PPV (73.0% vs. bp-PI-RADS: 47.7%, S-PI-RADS: 52.5%). When PSA > 10 ng/ml, S-PI-RADS demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.6% vs. mp-PI-RADS: 83.2%, bp-PI-RADS: 81.2%) and F1-score (0.873 [0.822-0.924] vs. mp-PI-RADS: 0.832 [0.778-0.886], bp-PI-RADS: 0.831 [0.777-0.885]). Among DWI category 3 PZ lesions, neither DCE nor T2WI significantly stratified csPCa risk (P = 0.657 and P = 0.424), whereas LV ≥ 0.5 cm³ showed markedly higher csPCa risk (83.8% vs. 45.8%; P < 0.001).
conclusionsWhile mpMRI and bpMRI exhibit comparable overall diagnostic performance but context-dependent strengths: mpMRI demonstrates higher specificity for avoiding unnecessary biopsies when PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, whereas bpMRI (particularly S-PI-RADS) maximizes sensitivity for csPCa detection when PSA > 10 ng/ml. LV is anticipated to serve as a complementary radiological biomarker at the absence of DCE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.