ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025
Elucidating the etiology of idiopathic spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elucidating the etiology of idiopathic spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free blood within the abdominal cavity (hemoperitoneum) presents a significant diagnostic and interpretive challenge. It may result from trauma or occur spontaneously in association with underlying disease conditions. When no source of fatal hemorrhage is identified, the implications extend across forensic, criminalistic, legal, and ethical domains. Idiopathic spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage (ISIH), historically known as abdominal apoplexy, is characterized by fatal hemoperitoneum in the absence of trauma or known nontraumatic causes of intraabdominal bleeding. Rupture of a small intraabdominal vessel is suspected; however, the bleeding source usually remains unidentified. We report the case of a 45-year-old female with cirrhosis who succumbed to ISIH. Autopsy revealed massive hemoperitoneum and signs of exsanguination. Careful dissection of the abdominal cavity identified hemorrhagic ectopic venous varices beneath the right diaphragmatic arch, covered by an organized blood clot. Histological analysis confirmed recent hemorrhage and demonstrated suspected rupture of the parietal peritoneum near dilated ectopic venous varices. This case is evaluated in the context of pathophysiology, etiological theories, diagnostic limitations, potential contributions of imaging modalities, and forensic relevance. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of ISIH with dual confirmation-both gross and histological-of hemorrhage originating from ectopic varices. These findings testify that rupture of ectopic venous varices may cause fatal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis and underscore the necessity of meticulous autopsy and histopathological correlation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.