ArticlePlant methods2025
Disentangling soybean GxE effects in an integrated genomic prediction and machine learning-GWAS workflow.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of low-density high-throughput marker platform and easy-to-measure traits for genomic prediction of biomass yield in oat (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2026Article
- Crop wild relatives of legumes: evolutionary resources for climate-responsive pre-breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Beyond QTL and GWAS: how deep learning, graph models, and multi-omics are reshaping plant genomic prediction analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating genotype-by-Environment (GxE) interactions into genomic prediction models has been demonstrated to enhance the accuracy of predictions for crops exposed to unfavourable environmental conditions. However, despite the increasing complexity of machine learning models in genomic prediction, no model or approach has been found to be overall superior in comparison to a classical genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. In this paper, we compared two GBLUP models (Linear Mixed Effects model and Bayesian GBLUP) with two machine learning models (Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting) on the EUCLEG soybean genotype set phenotyped in Belgium and Serbia. We found similar performance for the Bayesian GBLUP and the two machine learning methods. However, using a workflow that decomposed the environment-specific BLUPs into a main genetic and an interaction GxE effect, we found increased predictive ability for the interaction component compared to a single-component approach. Furthermore, conducting a machine learning-genome wide association study (ML-GWAS) on both components allowed us to identify important markers for the main genetic effect, as well as environment-specific markers. These could then be associated with correlated markers in other environments. By constructing a small random forest model using only 50 uncorrelated, important markers we constructed a genomic prediction model with similar predictive ability over all scenarios when compared to the large models including all markers. The results demonstrate a new, integrated genomic prediction and machine learning-genome-wide association study (ML-GWAS) approach, aimed at high predictive ability and coupled marker detection in the soybean genome for traits phenotyped in different environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.