Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855500›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2025

Disentangling soybean GxE effects in an integrated genomic prediction and machine learning-GWAS workflow.

Niel Verbrigghe, Hilde Muylle, Marie Pegard, Hendrik Rietman, Vuk Đorđević, Marina Ćeran, Isabel Roldán-Ruiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niel VerbrigghePlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Melle, Belgium. niel.verbrigghe@ilvo.vlaanderen.be.
Hilde MuyllePlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Melle, Belgium.
Marie PegardUnité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies Et Plantes Fourragères (P3F), INRAE, Lusignan, France.
Hendrik RietmanAgro Seed Research BV, Oudsbergen, Belgium.
Vuk ĐorđevićInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Marina ĆeranInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Isabel Roldán-RuizPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Melle, Belgium.

Funding

Horizon 2020 727312Horizon Europe 101081878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating genotype-by-Environment (GxE) interactions into genomic prediction models has been demonstrated to enhance the accuracy of predictions for crops exposed to unfavourable environmental conditions. However, despite the increasing complexity of machine learning models in genomic prediction, no model or approach has been found to be overall superior in comparison to a classical genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. In this paper, we compared two GBLUP models (Linear Mixed Effects model and Bayesian GBLUP) with two machine learning models (Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting) on the EUCLEG soybean genotype set phenotyped in Belgium and Serbia. We found similar performance for the Bayesian GBLUP and the two machine learning methods. However, using a workflow that decomposed the environment-specific BLUPs into a main genetic and an interaction GxE effect, we found increased predictive ability for the interaction component compared to a single-component approach. Furthermore, conducting a machine learning-genome wide association study (ML-GWAS) on both components allowed us to identify important markers for the main genetic effect, as well as environment-specific markers. These could then be associated with correlated markers in other environments. By constructing a small random forest model using only 50 uncorrelated, important markers we constructed a genomic prediction model with similar predictive ability over all scenarios when compared to the large models including all markers. The results demonstrate a new, integrated genomic prediction and machine learning-genome-wide association study (ML-GWAS) approach, aimed at high predictive ability and coupled marker detection in the soybean genome for traits phenotyped in different environments.

Indexed as

Genomic predictionGWASGxEMachine learningRandom forestSoybean

Identifiers

PMID40855500
PMCPMC12376716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.