Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855486›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Wastewater as an early indicator for short-term forecasting COVID-19 hospitalization in Germany.

Jonas Radermacher, Steffen Thiel, Aimo Kannt, Holger Fröhlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonas RadermacherDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven 1, Sankt Augustin, 53757, Germany. jonas.radermacher@scai.fraunhofer.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6056-3144
Steffen ThielUniversity of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Aimo KanntFraunhofer Institute of Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, 60596, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-2286
Holger FröhlichDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven 1, Sankt Augustin, 53757, Germany. holger.froehlich@scai.fraunhofer.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-1243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected daily life and posed significant challenges for politics, the economy, and the education system. To better prepare for such situations and implement effective measures, it is crucial to accurately assess, monitor, and forecast the progression of a pandemic. This study examines the potential of integrating wastewater surveillance data to enhance an autoregressive COVID-19 forecasting model for Germany and its federal states.

methodsFirst, we explore the cross-correlations between SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA load measured in wastewater and COVID-19 hospitalization considering different time-lags. Further, the study compares the performance of different models, including Random Forest regressors, XGBoost regressors, ARIMA models, linear regression, and ridge regression models, both with and without the use of wastewater data as predictors. For decision tree-based models, we also analyze the performance of fully cross-modal models that rely solely on viral load measurements to predict COVID-19 hospitalization rates.

resultsOur retrospective analysis suggest that wastewater data can potentially serve as an early warning indicator of impending trends in hospitalization at a national level, as it shows a strong correlation with hospitalization figures of up to 86% and tends to lead them by up to 8 days. Despite this, including wastewater data in the prediction models did not statistical significantly enhance the accuracy of COVID-19 hospitalization forecasts. The ARIMA model without the inclusion of wastewater viral load data emerged as the best-performing model, achieving a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 4.76% forecasting hospitalization 7 days ahead. However, wastewater viral load proved to be a valuable standalone predictor, offering an objective alternative to classical surveillance methods for monitoring pandemic trends.

conclusionThis study reinforces the potential of wastewater surveillance as an early warning tool for COVID-19 hospitalizations in Germany. While strong correlations were observed, the integration of wastewater data into predictive models did not improve their performance. Nevertheless, wastewater viral load serves as a valuable indicator for monitoring pandemic trends, suggesting its utility in public health surveillance and resource allocation. Further research may help to clarify the real-time applicability of wastewater data and expand its use to other pathogens and data sources.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalizationWastewaterForecastingGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Viral LoadWastewaterCOVID-19ForecastingMachine LearningPandemicSurveillanceWastewater

Identifiers

PMID40855486
PMCPMC12376350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.