ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Hospital acquired drug resistant pathogens infections in patients with viral respiratory tract infections: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advancements in artificial intelligence applications for the mitigation of antimicrobial resistance: challenges and opportunities.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based early warning model for carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundViral respiratory infections (VRTIs) caused by influenza (Flu) and COVID-19 pose significant global health challenges. Clinical outcomes are further exacerbated by infections with hospital acquired drug resistant pathogens (DRPs).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 1,051 hospitalized patients with VRTIs from 2018 to 2024 at Beijing Ditan Hospital. Firstly, 280 drug-resistant strains were isolated from 185 patients with hospital-acquired DRPs infections for extended antibiogram analysis. Secondly, Interpretable machine learning (ML) was employed to predict the risk factors for hospital acquired DRPs infections in patients with VRTIs. Using the optimal feature subset, seven ML prediction models were developed. Parameter tuning was performed via 10-fold cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was used to interpret the optimal model.
resultsPathogen distribution in 280 clinical samples revealed sputum (65.36%) as themainsource, followed byblood (15.36%), urine (11.43%), and lavage fluid (5.00%). In all clinical specimens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus hominis, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter baumannii predominated in sputum, blood, urine, and lavage fluid, respectively. In terms of overall detection counts, the most frequently isolated strains were P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and A. baumannii. The drug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa to third-generation cephalosporins (such as ceftriaxone and cefotaxime) exceeds 89%, but it has relatively higher sensitivity to ceftazidime (71.7%) and cefepime (69.6%). Its drug resistance rates to imipenem and meropenem reach 45.7%. Although amikacin shows 100% sensitivity, combination with β-lactam antibiotics is recommended to reduce mortality. K. pneumoniae shows resistance rates of 53.3% to imipenem and 46.7% to meropenem, with over 50% resistance to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Effective agents include sulfamethoxazole (68.9% susceptible), tigecycline (64.4%), chloramphenicol (62.2%), and amikacin (62.2%). Tigecycline combined with aminoglycosides has synergistic effects and inhibits resistant strains. A. baumannii was highly resistant to nearly all tested antibiotics, showing only partial susceptibility to minocycline (59.5%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (38.1%). Among the seven ML models, the neural network (NN) achieved the best predictive performance. The SHAP method revealed the top 15 predictive variables by importance ranking, including length of stay (LOS), cholinesterase (CHE), age, albumin (ALB), etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.