Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855360›Full record

ArticleNature computational science2025

Deep active optimization for complex systems.

Ye Wei, Bo Peng, Ruiwen Xie, Yangtao Chen, Yu Qin, Peng Wen, Stefan Bauer, Po-Yen Tung, Dierk Raabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature computational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ye Wei *Department of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. ye.wei@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-2298
Bo Peng *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-9076
Ruiwen Xie *Institute of Materials Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Yangtao Chen *Helmholtz AI, Munich, Germany.
Yu Qin *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peng Wen *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Stefan Bauer *Helmholtz AI, Munich, Germany.
Po-Yen Tung *MatNex, London, UK.
Dierk RaabeMax Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials, Düsseldorf, Germany. d.raabe@mpie.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-6124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring optimal solutions from limited data is considered the ultimate goal in scientific discovery. Artificial intelligence offers a promising avenue to greatly accelerate this process. Existing methods often depend on large datasets, strong assumptions about objective functions, and classic machine learning techniques, restricting their effectiveness to low-dimensional or data-rich problems. Here we introduce an optimization pipeline that can effectively tackle complex, high-dimensional problems with limited data. This approach utilizes a deep neural surrogate to iteratively find optimal solutions and introduces additional mechanisms to avoid local optima, thereby minimizing the required samples. Our method finds superior solutions in problems with up to 2,000 dimensions, whereas existing approaches are confined to 100 dimensions and need considerably more data. It excels across varied real-world systems, outperforming current algorithms and enabling efficient knowledge discovery. Although focused on scientific problems, its benefits extend to numerous quantitative fields, paving the way for advanced self-driving laboratories.

Identifiers

PMID40855360
PMCPMC12457189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.