ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025
Induced sputum: current progress and prospect.
Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Induced sputum versus bronchoalveolar lavage in lower respiratory tract infection: an exploratory paired diagnostic study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Multi-Compartment Cytological Approach to Severe Asthma Phenotyping: The BRISA Study (Biomedical Research in Severe Asthma).Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Induced sputum is a noninvasive, safe, cost-effective, and reproducible method that is particularly advantageous for individuals who do not naturally produce sputum or provide inadequate samples. Its higher quality than spontaneously produced sputum makes it valuable in various respiratory conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, lung cancer, and infectious respiratory diseases. Despite its potential, the clinical use of induced sputum is limited. In conditions like interstitial lung disease, where patients often have a dry cough, induced sputum shows promise, albeit with limited research. This review emphasizes the usefulness of induced sputum in such conditions, aiming for induced sputum to be established as a routine supplementary examination in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.